Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Stanley Brown v. William Suter, et al
as 08-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley E. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk for the US Supreme Court, Mia Carpiello, Esquire, Mary E. Butler, Esquire and others
MCDONALD v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00739
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, RUTH JONES and OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SMITH v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 1:2008cv00737
Plaintiff:
GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCDONALD v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, RUTH JONES and OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00375
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E. BROWN
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, MIA CARPIELLO, MARY E. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITCH v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
JIM FITCH
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER and C. R. HIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRONCKE v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2007cv01975
Defendant:
GAIL JOHNSON and WILLIAM K. SUTER
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL KRONCKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FENLON et al v. SUTER et al
as 1:2007cv01652
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. FENLON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR., DONNA MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2007cv01586
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. CONNER
Defendant:
HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR., TRAXLER, SHEDD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YATES v. BREYER et al
as 1:2007cv01549
Plaintiff:
DAN YATES
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. BREYER, WILLIAM K. SUTER and ERIK FOSSUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
