Cases 71 - 79 of 79
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOURDON et al v. WINTER et al
as 1:2009cv01229
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN THOMAS BOURDON and JEFFERY G. WALLS
Defendant:
DONALD C. WINTER, O TOM CRANE, HARRIS CUMMINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
BARRIOS v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2007cv01244
Plaintiff:
FREDDY RENE BARRIOS
Defendant:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers, Frank, et al v. Howard University, et al
as 03-7074
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Frank Summers, Carl Bailey, Gregory Burroughs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Howard University
JOHNSON et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2002cv02364
Plaintiff:
DIANNA JOHNSON , RUBBIYA MUHAMMED , CAROLYN MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
TODD DILLARD
Cross_defendant:
TODD DILLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL, et al v. ISLAMIC REP/IRAN, et al
as 1:2001cv02104
Plaintiff:
MARIE CAMPBELL , SHYRL L. JOHNSON , BRIDGET A. BROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:1999cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Americbl Intl Inc v. Dept of Navy, et al
as 96-5050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Americable International, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of the Navy, John H. Dalton, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, J. E. Buffington, in his Official Capacity as Commander and Chief of Civil Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae:
Cable Telecommunications Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
