Cases 71 - 80 of 7,374
USA v. Keith Berman
as 24-3044
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Berman, also known as Matthew Steinmann
XELUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
TUSHKHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HURT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KU KLUX KLAN and NRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNTRY OF MEXICO and COUNTRY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSEBAR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR, ERIC M. ROSEBAR and ERIN M. ROSEBAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALVIN GROSS, FORTY ACRES REALTY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00837
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DMV CONVENIENCE, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
DMV Convenience, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Judicial Review of Admin Determination by DOA
World Shipping Council v. FMC, et al
as 24-1088
Petitioner:
World Shipping Council
Respondent:
Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America
USA v. Taylor Johnatakis
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Taylor James Johnatakis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
