Cases 71 - 80 of 238
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. PRC
as 19-1026
Petitioner:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Undetermined:
Amazon.com Services, Inc., Pitney Bowes Inc., Parcel Shippers Association and others
Randall Ehrlich v. PRC
as 19-1004
Petitioner:
Randall Ehrlich
Undetermined:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
MCLAUGHLIN v. PROCTOR et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Plaintiff:
TRAIDARIUS MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant:
DONALD PROCTOR and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DBW PARTNERS, LLC v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv03127
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DBW PARTNERS, LLC and DBW PARTNERS, LLC doing business as CAPITOL FORUM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BRAUN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv02914
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DAVID STEVEN BRAUN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2018cv02553
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) et al
as 1:2018cv01583
Defendant:
PAUL J. MCNULTY, JAMES G. ROCHE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JUSTE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv00708
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MAIL CLERK, DETENTION OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCIEN v. LEVIN et al
as 1:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
STACY LUCIEN
Defendant:
BRUCE LEVIN , KEYSTAR LLC , MARIO LLOYDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
