Cases 81 - 90 of 377
BERGER et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2019mc00208
Defendant:
STELLA E. ANDERSON, KEN RAYMOND, DAVID C. BLACK and others
Plaintiff:
WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
MOORE v. N.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv03170
Defendant:
C.I.A., N.S.A. and U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABUDUMIJITI v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv02588
Defendant:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, HON JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Acting Commissioner MARK MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. TUEGAN ABUDUMIJITI and TUEGAN ABUDUMIJITI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01922
Defendant:
JUSTICE DEPT. and BARR
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Surf Moore v. William Barr, et al
as 19-5175
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and William Pelham Barr, Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Surf Moore
MOORE v. U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 1:2019cv01718
Plaintiff:
MAURICE B. MOORE
Not Yet Classified:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Defendant:
U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01206
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and BARR
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEHIGH REGIOINAL MEDICAL CENTER et al V. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01014
Plaintiff:
NMMC GILMORE - AMORY, EAST GEORGIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ALLIANCE HEALTH SEMINOLE and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MOORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00844
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA J. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv00636
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and BARR
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
