Cases 81 - 90 of 110
KISSI v. MEAD et al
as 1:2008cv02031
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MEAD, ESTATE FOR FRED W. BENNETT, BENNETT & BAIR and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grant Adams, et al v. DOT, et al
as 08-1360
Petitioner:
Grant O. Adams, Jose R. Arias, Robert H. Attaway and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration
CONNOLLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01927
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, W. LEE RAWLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PAULINE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01788
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAULINE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME-WASHINGTON and PEARSON SUNDERLAND
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PEARSON v. UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01753
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTH CARE INC., ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirk Benoit v. USDA
as 08-5434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kirk Benoit, Dorothy Deloney, Charles Harris and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Ed Schafer and others
PEARSON v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2008cv01691
Petitioner:
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON
Respondent:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilbur Cook v. Eddie Pearson
as 08-5353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilbur E. Cook
Defendant - Appellee:
Eddie L. Pearson, Warden, US District Court for the Eastern District of Norfolk Division
Omar Pearson v. United States of America, et al
as 08-5216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Omar Demetrious Pearson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, White House Building, James C. Turk, State of North Carolina and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
