Cases 81 - 90 of 16,247
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
National Parks Conservation Association v. DOI, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
National Parks Conservation Association
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Charles F. Sams, III, in his Official Capacity as Director of the National Park Service and others
ALKOUDMANI et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
RASHA ALKOUDMANI and NASSER SELO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CTIA - The Wireless Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-1166
Petitioner:
CTIA - The Wireless Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
USA v. Robert Miller
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Frank Miller, also known as Robert Franklin Miller
TOBEE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
LUSA KOI TOBEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RIOJAS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY RIOJAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01559
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY v. ADVANCED INSULATION CONCEPTS, INC.
as 1:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Defendant:
ADVANCED INSULATION CONCEPTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
