Cases 1 - 10 of 252
IN RE JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
as 1:2024mc00056
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
Petitioner:
PRESS COALITION
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Iztok Plevnik v. Eugene Sullivan, et al
as 24-7013
Plaintiff:
Iztok Plevnik
Defendant:
Eugene R. Sullivan, James R. Billington, in his individual capacity; United States Embassy, Todd J. Brown, in his individual capacity; Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant:
VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
