Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Mary Williams v. Julio Aviles, et al
as 24-7004
Plaintiff:
Mary Cecilia Williams
Defendant:
Julio E. Aviles, doing business as Universal Air Duct Services and Frederick Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
DOTY et al v. ADT, LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00139
Plaintiff:
SHANA DOTY
Defendant:
ADT, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. and TELESFORO AVILES
Petitioner:
ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02905
Plaintiff:
SHANA DOTY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and TELESFORO AVILES
Petitioner:
ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
USA v. Luz Fajardo Campos
as 21-3051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luz Irene Fajardo Campos, also known as La Comadre, also known as Jenny Campos, also known as Jenny Aviles, also known as Jenca
WILLIAMS v. AVILES et al
as 1:2020cv00931
Plaintiff:
MARY C WILLIAMS and MARY C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JULIO E AVILES, FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, JULIO E. AVILES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVILA CALIXTO et al v. ACOSTA et al
as 1:2019cv01853
Plaintiff:
JORGE PALAFOX JUAREZ, JOEL DAVILA CALIXTO, LEONARDO AVILES ROMERO and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary of Labor R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Ramon Aviles v. William Barr
as 19-1106
Petitioner:
Ramon Ventura Aviles
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General
AVILES-ROTHCHILD v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv02196
Plaintiff:
DEAN HIMBLER AVILES-ROTHCHILD
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
