Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CI FILING SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CI FILING SYSTEMS, LLC, IFS FILING SYSTEMS, LLC, Thomas Corey and others
Not Classified By Court:
PERMCLIP PRODUCTS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
STONE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE CA/OCS/CI et al
as 1:2021cv03244
Plaintiff:
JACK STONE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE CA/OCS/CI and U.S. EMBASSY TOKYO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
STONE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE CA/OCS/CI et al
as 1:2021cv03155
Plaintiff:
JACK STONE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE CA/OCS/CI and U.S. EMBASSY TOKYO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jack Stone v. U.S. Embassy Tokyo, et al
as 21-5055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jack Stone
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Embassy Tokyo and United States Department of State, CA/OCS/CI
Jack Stone v. U.S. Embassy Tokyo, et al
as 21-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jack Stone
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Embassy Tokyo and United States Department of State, CA/OCS/CI
Jack Stone v. U.S. Embassy Tokyo, et al
as 20-5360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jack Stone
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Embassy Tokyo and United States Department of State, CA/OCS/CI
STONE v. U.S. EMBASSY TOKYO et al
as 1:2019cv03273
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE CA/OCS/CI and U.S. EMBASSY TOKYO
Plaintiff:
JACK STONE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CIES et al v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
as 1:2007cv00614
Plaintiff:
NANCY CIES and CRAIG CIES
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
