Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOLE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. THOLE, JOAN M. THOLE, GAIL ANN BALCOM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. SWANN et al
as 1:2020cv02979
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, HOPE L. SWANN, TIFFANY L. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv02889
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN D. BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN ALLEN v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., JOHN J. FASO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2017cv02680
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE D. BROOKS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BROOKS v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. BROOKS
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., THOMAS N. FAUST, G. FUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. BROOKS
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., THOMAS N. FAUST, GREGORY FUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00144
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, BRUCE PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SIMON v. FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., et al
as 1:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant:
FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., STEVE SHCWALB, KAROLYN D. ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
