Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Tigress McDaniel v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 24-7198
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Christopher J. Loebsack, Bar No. 23429, Guilford County 24th Judicial District and others
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Oscar Dantzler v. William Jorden, et al
as 24-7192
Defendant:
Yolanda Cezar, Individually and in her capacity as an Attorney through Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board as the screening Counsel, 19th Judicial District Court Of Louisiana, For the East Baton Rouge Parish and their agents one - five, John Bel Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dantzler
USA v. Douglas Harrington
as 24-3177
Defendant:
Douglas Harrington
Plaintiff:
United States of America
KUNG v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2024cv03459
Defendant:
ACTBLUE CIVICS, INC., ACTBLUE LLC., DOUGLAS CRAIG EMHOFF and others
Plaintiff:
KIN WAH KUNG
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY v. KIPP DC SUPPORTING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS, SHANIQUE PEREZ and KIPP DC SUPPORTING CORPORATION d/b/a KIPP DC SHAW QALICB, INC., d/b/a KIPP DC DOUGLAS QALICB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Allan Wilson v. DOS, et al
as 24-5204
Defendant:
United States Department of State and United States Embassy Philippines
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Wilson
Bahig Bishay v. Trevor McFadden, et al
as 24-5197
Defendant:
Gregory George Katsas, Solely in individual capacity, Justin Reed Walker, Solely in individual capacity, Trevor Neil McFadden, Solely in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Bahig F. Bishay, Private Attorney General
MACKENZIE v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Douglas MacKenzie
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
