Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lisa Montgomery v. Jeffrey Rosen, et al
as 21-5001
Defendant / Appellee:
Office of the Pardon Attorney, Jeffrey Rosen, Acting Attorney General of the United States in his official capacity, T. J. Watson, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Terre Haute in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Marie Montgomery
Lisa Montgomery v. Jeffrey Rosen, et al
as 20-5379
Defendant / Appellant:
Rosalind Sargent-Burns, Acting Pardon Attorney in her official capacity, Barb Von Blackensee, Regional Director of the North Central Region of the BOP in her official capacity, Alix M. McLearen, National Administrator of Women and Special Populations Federal Bureau of Prisons in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lisa Marie Montgomery
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Coleman v. FLRA
as 16-1301
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Complex Coleman, Florida
Respondent:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
FLRA v. Department of Justice
as 13-1067
Petitioner:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Complex Coleman, Florida
United States Department of Ju v. FLRA
as 12-1383
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Complex Coleman, Florida
Respondent:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Webman, Randy, et al v. Fed Bur Pris, et al
as 05-5031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randy Webman and Larry Rozen
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Susan Van Baylin, Administrator for Chaplaincy Services of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Gerald J. Collins, National Administrator, Food and Farm Services of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
