Cases 1 - 10 of 14
YORK v. HARVEY
as 1:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
LAWANDA YORK
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Charles Appleby v. Francis Harvey
as 08-5226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles C. Appleby
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army
POOLE v. HARVEY
as 1:2007cv01320
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. POOLE
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CURRY v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY CURRY, JR.
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHARPS v. HARVEY
as 1:2007cv00036
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Plaintiff:
LEWIS SHARPS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Munaf, Mohammad, et al v. Harvey, Francis, et al
as 06-5324
Appellant:
Mohammad Munaf and Maisoon Mohammed, as Next Friend of Mohammad Munaf
Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the U.S. Army, William H. Brandenburg and Steele, Colonel
Role Models Amer Inc v. Harvey, Francis, et al
as 06-5294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Role Models America, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army and Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education
Lemon, Jim, et al v. Harvey, Francis J., et al
as 06-5278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jim Lemon and Robin Biser
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, The Honorable, Secretary of the Army, Penmar Development Corporation and Corporate Office Properties Trust
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Natural Resources Defense Council and National Trust for Historic Preservation
Aguayo, Agustin v. Harvey, Francis
as 06-5241
Appellant:
Agustin Aguayo
Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
