Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bassem Al-Tamimi, et al v. Sheldon Adelson, et al
as 23-5147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bassem Al-Tamimi, Susan Abulhawa, Doa'a Abu Amer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdur-Rahim Dudar
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheldon Adelson, Norman Braman, Lawrence Ellison and others
CABRERA et al v. BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03833
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA NEWSOM, BRAD JOSEPH HALLIDAY, ANGELA FRITZGES and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONAL, INC., LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. / BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
ALRIDGE v. G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS
as 1:2019cv01360
Plaintiff:
Courtney Aldridge and COURTNEY T. ALRIDGE
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions and G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bassem Al-Tamimi, et al v. Sheldon Adelson, et al
as 17-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bassem Al-Tamimi, Susan Abulhawa, Doa'a Abu Amer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheldon Adelson, Norman Braman, Lawrence Ellison and others
AL-TAMIMI et al v. ADELSON et al
as 1:2016cv00445
Defendant:
ADELSON, SHELDON ADELSON, NORMAN BRAMAN and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TAMIMI, BASSEM AL-TAMIMI, SUSAN ABULHAWA and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MIRIAM ADELSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FANNING v. G4S INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01308
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
G4S INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. and CENTERRA INTEGRATED SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
G4S Regulated Security v. NLRB
as 13-1171
Petitioner:
G4S Regulated Security Solutions, A Division of G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc., formerly known as The Wackenhut Corporation
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
