Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HINTON v. NATION et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
LUCIA PHARR HINTON
Not Classified By Court:
DARRYL LACOUNTE and 1-10 SAM DOES
Defendant:
CHEROKEE NATION, JOHN DOES #1-#10, SAM DOES #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SISAUDIA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv03689
Plaintiff:
ALICIA SISAUDIA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, CHEROKEE NATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
HESS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv03385
Plaintiff:
ISAAC WILLIAM HESS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, CHEROKEE NATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HURRY v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv02435
Defendant:
JOHN R JILOVEC, HILLARY R HOSKINS, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE HURRY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ALLAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. ALLAN , VICTOR AMBURGY , JUDY COX BARKELY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
ANGULO et al v. GRAY et al
as 1:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
PEDRO ANGULO , ERIC D. SHULTZ and MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Defendant:
VINCENT C. GRAY and VICTOR L HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ANDERSON et al v. VILSACK
as 1:2009cv01507
Plaintiff:
LARRY F. ANDERSON, BOBBY ABRAHAM, CHARLENE ADAMS and others
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
