Cases 1 - 10 of 103
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WHITTIER HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Garrett Hawkins
as 24-3001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Garrett Hawkins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HAWKINS v. DANAHER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HAWKINS
Defendant:
DANAHER CORPORATION, RAINER M. BLAIR and MATT MCGREW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HAWKINS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03859
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER
Plaintiff:
CARLTON HAWKINS and MICHELLE A HAWKINS
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Colin Hawkins v. FBI, et al
as 22-5079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Colin Hawkins
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
