Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
John T Hansen and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Danaher Corp. Shareholder
as 21-7080
In Re:
In re: Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of Danaher Corporation and Harry Markarian, Derivatively on Behalf of Danaher Corporation (20-2846)
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas P. Joyce Jr., Walter G. Lohr Jr., John T. Schwieters and others
John Pickering-George v. DOJ, et al
as 20-5301
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Antitrust Division
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Pickering-George
MARKARIAN v. JOYCE JR. et al
as 1:2020cv02846
Defendant:
THOMAS P. JOYCE JR., JOHN T. SCHWIETERS, ALAN G. SPOON and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY MARKARIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
