Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TWARDY et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TWARDY, CLARENCE E. OWENS, FRANCES ROGERS and others
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
USA v. Garfield Taylor
as 20-3089
Defendant / Appellant:
Garfield M. Taylor
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
TAYLOR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARY M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. WASHINGTON DC SUPREME COURT
as 1:2018cv01168
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Garfield Taylor
as 17-3055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Garfield M. Taylor
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2016cv00988
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GARFIELD M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2013cv00616
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
RANDOLPH M. TAYLOR, PATRICK DILDINE, BENJAMIN C. DALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Theft of Satellite Communications Services
BRADFIELD v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2012cv01631
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. BRADFIELD
Defendant:
ANDREW R. MITCHELL, TTSTE, INC., WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GARFIELD TAYLOR INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2011cv02054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
GARFIELD TAYLOR INCORPORATED, GIBRALTAR ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, GARFIELD TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Donald Jones v. Louisiana State Bar Assoc., et al
as 10-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Louisiana State Bar Association, Mark C. Landry, Ronald H. Newman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
