Cases 1 - 10 of 35
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00242
Not Yet Classified:
TRAMAINE NEWSOME
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00237
Not Yet Classified:
TRAMAINE NEWSOME and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI and LALA MAHA MOQADDEM (REGRAGUI)
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, SHERRI BLUEBOND, PATRICIA GUERRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. NEWSOM
as 1:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
August Cabrera, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 23-7076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
August Cabrera, M.G.C., by and through his next friend August Cabrera, R.X.C., by and through his next friend August Cabrera and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
K.E.F.V., by and through her next friend Hortense Vickers
Defendant / Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran
NEWSOME v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02224
Plaintiff:
MASIE ALISA NEWSOME
Defendant:
KILOLO J. KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Omar Alejandro v. Gavin Newsom
as 22-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omar Medina Alejandro
Defendant / Appellee:
Gavin Newsom, Governor of California
ALEJANDRO v. NEWSOM
as 1:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
