Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ENFORCEMENT OF A RESTRAINING ORDER BY THE COURT O F PALEMO, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC TO RESTRAIN THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY et al
as 1:2022mc00062
In Re:
ENFORCEMENT OF A RESTRAINING ORDER BY THE COURT O F PALEMO, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC TO RESTRAIN THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 150 WEST 56 STREET, UNIT 4307, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03063
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. and ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. BERKSHIRE TELEPHONE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
XO NEW YORK, INC., TACONIC TELEPHONE CORP., NEW NEXTLINK NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC. and MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party:
DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner:
XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
United States Department of Ju v. FLRA
as 14-1152
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Metropolitan Correctional Center New York, New York
Respondent:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
American Federation of Government Employees Council of Prison Locals #33, Local 3148
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2012cv01690
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION , APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB , APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY and others
Defendant:
KENNETH SALAZAR and DENNIS REIDENBACH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
