Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) et al
as 1:2018cv01583
Defendant:
PAUL J. MCNULTY, JAMES G. ROCHE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATTKISSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01437
Plaintiff:
SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON , JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON and SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PATRICK R. DONAHOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ATTKISSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON , JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON and SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , PATRICK R. DONAHOE , UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SOTO v. ARCHULETA et al
as 1:2014cv00916
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SOTO
Defendant:
KATHERINE ARCHULETA and PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8715
Daniel Cobble v. Patrick Donahoe
as 14-5022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick R. Donahoe, United States Postmaster General; and his predecessor and protege
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
