Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LLOYD et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2021cv03312
Plaintiff:
Mary LLOYD and Merrellyn LLOYD
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SIMEONE & MILLER, LLP
Defendant:
WMATA, Warren DONALD and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02974
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GRAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02118
Defendant:
JOHN STADNIK, UNNAMED J. DOE OFFICERS, JENDY OLIVO and others
Plaintiff:
TANIKA GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUHOLTZ v. TROMBITAS et al
as 1:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BUHOLTZ
Defendant:
SIMEON G. TROMBITAS, RICHARD N. HELFER, DAVID E. SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUHOLTZ v. TROMBITAS et al
as 1:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BUHOLTZ
Defendant:
SIMEON G. TROMBITAS, RICHARD N. HELFER, DAVID E. SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMEONE & MILLER, LLP et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01421
Plaintiff:
SIMEONE & MILLER, LLP and DEBORAH GOLANSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF MARYLAND, KEY HEALTH MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
ANGEL et al v. DSI BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01347
Plaintiff:
BERNARDINO ANGEL , SIMEON ALVARADO VELASQUEZ and MELVIN OMAR SOTO GUZMAN
Defendant:
DSI BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David Henderson v. Carlos Hidalgo, et al
as 08-7132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David E. Henderson
Defendant - Appellee:
Carlos Hidalgo, Collector Compass Bank, Phylis Finnalau, Amtrak Agent, Simeon Fern-Gunn, Deputy Counsel and others
HENDERSON v. HIDALGO et al
as 1:2008cv01856
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. HENDERSON
Defendant:
CARLOS HIDALGO, PHYLIS FINNALAU, SIMEON FERN-GUNN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
