Cases 1 - 9 of 9
REVOLVING DOOR PROJECT v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
THE REVOLVING DOOR PROJECT and REVOLVING DOOR PROJECT
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HLASS et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2021cv02200
Plaintiff:
LAILA L HLASS, DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES and LAILA L. HLASS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FREEMAN v. FADD et al
as 1:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
FADD, JOHN HESS, HANK WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 16-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond, CAO and others
SERRANO v. CHICKEN-OUT INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
MARIA SERRANO
Defendant:
CHICKEN-OUT INC., CHICKEN OUT THE DOOR INC., NICHOLAS CORDONE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CAMPBELL v. GARDEN CITY GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, JULIE CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Freeman v. Hugo Charvis, et al
as 11-7105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Elliott Freeman
Defendant - Appellee:
Hugo Charvis, OPEC, HOVENSA, HOVIC, AMERADA HESS, Mummad Khaddfi, OPEC, HOVENSA, HOVIC, UDCI, John Hess, OPEC, HOVENSA, HOVIC AMERADA HESS and others
FREEMAN vs. CHARVIS ET AL
as 1:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
HUGO CHARVIS, MUMMAD KHADDFI, JOHN HESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association of Home B, et al v. EPA
as 10-1183
Petitioner:
National Association of Home Builders, Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
