Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Brian Firebaugh, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner:
Brian Firebaugh, Chloe Joy Sexton, Talia Cadet and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, in his capacity as United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WITCHARD v. SURAMPUDI et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Defendant:
VIJAYA S. SURAMPUDI, MATTHEW H. SOLOMSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Matthews v. BOP, et al
as 23-5304
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin Matthews
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and others
James Brady v. Merrick Garland
as 23-5246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James H. Brady
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USHER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02086
Plaintiff:
RICHARD USHER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE ANTITRUST DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BERRY v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv01814
Petitioner:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrew Cox v. Merrick Garland
as 23-5108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Cox
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
