Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 195
CLEAR BLUE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Rowe et al
as 1:2024cv01216
Plaintiff: CLEAR BLUE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: MICHAEL ROWE, PCHANGE PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC, VESTA MANAGEMENT DC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Courtney Smith, et al
as 24-5035
Plaintiff: Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr.
Defendant: Courtney L. Smith, Kenneth M. Carpenter, Amanda L. Meredith, Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BIDEN v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2023cv02711
Plaintiff: ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN
Defendant: UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
HOWARTH v. MCFADDEN PARTNERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff: MORGAN HOWARTH
Defendant: MCFADDEN PARTNERS, MARK MCFADDEN, HUNTER MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WILLIAMS STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01520
Plaintiff: AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant: JILL BIDEN and ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNTER v. PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff: JASON HUNTER, SR.
Defendant: PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?