Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Frazier v. Marlin, TX
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHEYENNE MITCHELL FRAZIER
Defendant:
MARLIN, TX
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN SODEK, by and through his heirs at law, Vicki Sodek and Randy Sodek
Jones-Bey v. Chen
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SISTER E. JONES-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA K. CHEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, LETITIA JAMES and others
Anderson v. US
as 13-5117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALLPHIN, DANIEL ALVIA, FRANK AMADOR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
GLENN V DVA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-7027
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Nathan L. Glenn, Nathan L. Glenn, Nathan L. Glenn and others
DAVIS V DVA
as 08-7142
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Nathan J. Davis
Movant-Appellant:
Valerie Stanback
COLODNEY V HHS
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3246
Respondent:
Department of Health and Human Services
Petitioner:
Nathan Colodney
PEAVY V DVA
as 07-7092
Claimant-Appellant:
Nathan R. Peavy
Respondent-Appellee:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
COLODNEY V MSPB
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-3013
Intervenor:
Department of Health and Human Services
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Petitioner:
Nathan Colodney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.