Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Anderson v. US
as 23-2224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY M. ANDERSON, PAUL L. BAILEY, RONALD L. BLASH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Henderson v. US
as 23-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID F. HENDERSON, LARRY S. WALTERS, WARREN H. NELSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CLAPSADDLE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01312
Petitioner:
GLENN E. CLAPSADDLE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
GLENN E. ROBINSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DICKERSON et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
GLENN DICKERSON, DEIDRE DICKERSON, ROBERT GOODWIN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Micu v. US
as 23-1412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA MICU, and all others similarly situated, SCOTT HOLLAND, CATHERINE POPOVICI and others
Plaintiff:
ELISIO SOARES, SANDRA GARZA RODRIGUEZ, ERICH SCHROEDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Micu v. US
as 23-1366
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINA MICU, and all others similarly situated, SCOTT HOLLAND, CATHERINE POPOVICI and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
MorrisIn re: Morris
as 23-1015
Appellant:
In re: JESSICA MORRIS, GLENN RIGGS, AMY DALEY and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant:
In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
