Cases 41 - 50 of 185
BARBER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00050
Petitioner:
SCOTT BARBER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
REDMOND v. USA
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
SCOTT D. REDMOND and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Albright v. US
as 19-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA REIMERS FAMILY TRUST, BEVERLY J. EVERS, CARLA C. ALBRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY J. KEEGAN, BENJAMIN H. HATHAWAY, GEORGE W. DEGEER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Albright v. US
as 19-2316
Plaintiff:
TRACY J. KEEGAN, STUART HOFFMAN, BENJAMIN H. HATHAWAY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL EARL HIGGINS, III, ZELDA L. OPOKA and MICHAEL J. OPOKA
Ron v. US
as 21-1891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ESCOBAR, PETER ZWART, T. SCOTT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Codrea v. Garland
as 21-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT HEUMAN, OWEN MONROE and DAVID CODREA
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTY WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mike Finnin Motors, Inc. v. US
as 20-1205
Plaintiff:
MILLER-CAMPBELL COMPANY, MATT MONTGOMERY, INC., ROHR-ALPHA MOTORS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUETTERMAN MOTORS, INC. and MIKE FINNIN MOTORS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Pena v. US
as 21-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHRYN B. ZIEMBA, HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
