Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Richmond v. US
as 21-2012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOBBY MARBURGER, KIMBERLY BUSH, JAMES KIRKLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Richmond v. US
as 21-125
Respondent:
CARL WARNER, JOSEPH AUGUSTA, CHARLES PINNIZZOTTO and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Avalos v. US
as 21-119
Respondent:
THOMAS RHINEHART, JR., JASON DIGNAN, JOSEPH AUGUSTA and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Allensworth v. US
as 21-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUY MERRIT SHIVITZ, DIANE STRONG, DAVID LEWIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Cruz-Martin v. DHS
as 21-1014
Petitioner:
RAFAEL CRUZ-MARTIN
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-2394
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
TENERIFE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
TENERIFE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC , JUAN ALMEIDA LEON , FRANCISCO ALMEIDA LEON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
SYSTEM DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL, INC v. USA
as 1:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
SYSTEM DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL, INC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
CRUZ ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CRUZ v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00183
Petitioner:
ROSALINDA CRUZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
