Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Avalos v. US
as 21-119
Respondent: THOMAS RHINEHART, JR., JASON DIGNAN, JOSEPH AUGUSTA and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES
Koopmann v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1329
Plaintiff: EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM C. BRASHEAR and WILLIAM KOOPMANN
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
ATKINS v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01108
Plaintiff: NANCY G. ATKINS
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ATKINS v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01184
Plaintiff: ERIC ATKINS
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
PICKLE FACTORY CONDOS, LLC et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00042
Plaintiff: PICKLE FACTORY CONDOS, LLC , DANIEL AHERN , KAY AHERN and others
Defendant: USA
ALEMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff: YSIDRO ALEMAN , DAVID ALVARADO , RODNEY ATKINS and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00112
Plaintiff: ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: USA
Counter_claimant: USA
Counter_defendant: ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
VAS-CATH V CURATORS UNIV MISSOURI
as 08-1159
Defendant-Appellee: Angela M. Bennett, Anne C. Ream, Cheryl D.S. Walker and others
ATKINS V DVA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-7043
Claimant-Appellant: David A. Atkins
VAS-CATH V CURATORS UNIV MISSOURI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1100
Defendant-Appellee: ANGELA M. BENNETT, ANNE C. REAM, CHERYL D.S. WALKER and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: VAS-CATH INCORPORATED, VAS-CATH INCORPORATED and VAS-CATH INCORPORATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?