Cases 11 - 20 of 33
THERIOT et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
CHERYL THERIOT, DARIUS THERIOT, JAMES THERIOT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC
as 17-1118
Amicus Curiae:
STEVE WOZNIAK, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, JOSEPH SCOTT MILLER and others
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC and GOOGLE INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
WILLIAM E. SHAW TRUST v. USA
as 1:2014cv04244
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. SHAW TRUST
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
THERIOT et al v. USA
as 1:2015cv01038
Plaintiff:
CHERYL THERIOT, DARIUS THERIOT, JAMES THERIOT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
SHAW et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv00783
Plaintiff:
KAREN L. SHAW and RICHARD A. SHAW
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
SHAW v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00623
Petitioner:
RICKY L. SHAW
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
SHAW v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00402
Petitioner:
DONALD SHAW
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
SHAW et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00228
Petitioner:
SUSAN SHAW and S. S.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
RETRACTABLE TECH V BECTON DICKINSON
as 10-1402
Defendant-Appellant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Retractable Technologies, Inc., Thomas J. Shaw, Retractable Technologies, Inc. and others
BLOCK V VA
as 10-7045
Petitioner:
Brenda Iwasyk, David M. Jacobs, Patrick M. Burns and others
Respondent:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Secretary Of Veterans Affair:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
