Cases 11 - 20 of 34
BLODGETT et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv02000
Plaintiff:
DIANE S. BLODGETT and TOM LINGENFELTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BRUZOS et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv01408
Plaintiff:
EMILIANO BRUZOS , JAMES A. CAMPBELL , JOSE CASAS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 14-1335
Amicus Curiae:
CARROLL GANTZ, RALPH D. CLIFFORD, JOSEPH M. BALLAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California Corporation
BEHRENS et al v. USA
as 1:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. BEHRENS , ARLINE M. BEHRENS , MANUEL D. DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Anderson v. US
as 13-5117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALLPHIN, DANIEL ALVIA, FRANK AMADOR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00568
Petitioner:
TOM MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
ANDERSON et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
PHILIP L. ANDERSON , PAUL ARMSTRONG , JEFFREY AVEY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
SAUER WEST LLC, et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
SAUER WEST LLC, , SAUER PHANTOM 5, , SAUER WHITEHALL LLC, and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
GONZALES v. USA
as 1:2012cv00066
SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE , DENNY S. HURTADO , GORDON A. JAMES and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
