Cases 21 - 30 of 794
Cordes v. McDonough
as 24-1141
Claimant:
DAVID J. CORDES
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Dasso International, Inc. v. MOSO North America, Inc.
as 24-1135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DASSO INTERNATIONAL, INC. and EASOON USA, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
MOSO NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MOSO INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
BRETT KELLY, MARK CLIFTON and DAVID S. OSTERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID S. OSTERMAN, aka Steve Osterman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arlton v. Aerovironment, Inc.
as 24-1084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. ARLTON and DAVID J. ARLTON
Defendant / Appellee:
AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
GARRISON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01893
Petitioner:
DAVID GARRISON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023vv01841
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MOLTER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01719
Petitioner:
DAVID MOLTER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BOWEN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01711
Plaintiff:
DAVID NICHOLAS BOWEN and PATRICIA LYNN MULDONIAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TAYLOR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01703
Petitioner:
DAVID TAYLOR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RYLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01609
Petitioner:
DAVID A. RYLEY, M.D.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
