Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Loveridge v. US
as 19-2090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OREGON WRITERS COLONY, INC., RICHARD YOUNG, BARBARA L. THOMPSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE HELSER, STEVEN H. WILKINSON, THE ESTATE OF FRANK HARPER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
REAFLENG et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv04241
Plaintiff:
RANDALL RAY REAFLENG and MELANIE ANN REAFLENG
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
ALLENSWORTH et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALLENSWORTH , JAMES AMOS , MICHAEL ANTHONY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
MARTIN et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
DONALD MARTIN, JR. , PATRICIA A. MANBECK , JEFF ROBERTS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
RANDALL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00422
Petitioner:
LILLIAN RANDALL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
LORD et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00255
Petitioner:
LESLIE LORD , RANDALL MAGNUSKI and CHASE LORD
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
LEWIS V DVA
as 11-7090
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Randall R. Lewis
WHITNEY et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00809
Petitioner:
REBECCA WHITNEY, RANDALL WHITNEY and SCHUYLER WHITNEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
