Cases 41 - 50 of 196
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE PROPERTIES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
AETC II PRIVATIZED HOUSING, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
AETC II PRIVATIZED HOUSING, LLC and HUNT AETC II COMMUNITIES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
AIR FORCE ACADEMY MILITARY COMMUNITIES, LLC, HUNT SOUTHERN GROUP, LLC, BLB PRIVATIZED HOUSING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
EGAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00273
Petitioner:
SCOTT EGAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ADEGBITE et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
ADE A. ADEGBITE, JARED SCOTT ALTON, FRANCISCO MISAEL ARENAS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BARBER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00050
Petitioner:
SCOTT BARBER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
REDMOND v. USA
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
SCOTT D. REDMOND and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Ron v. US
as 21-1891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ESCOBAR, PETER ZWART, T. SCOTT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Codrea v. Garland
as 21-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT HEUMAN, OWEN MONROE and DAVID CODREA
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTY WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
