Cases 61 - 70 of 755
Greene v. US
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY LAMONTE GREENE and BILLIE WAYNE BYRD
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MICHAEL JACKSON, WILLIAM GEORGE COODEY, II, GARRY WAYNE WILSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
WOODS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01037
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WOODS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TONELLI et al
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. TONELLI, WILLIAM BENNETT, THERESA BENNETT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BOYD et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOYD, JR., KARA BOYD, LESTER BONNER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TRUST MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE D. WILLIAMS and TRUST MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ASHCRAFT et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
TONY ASHCRAFT, WANDA ASHCRAFT, WILLIAM BRUCE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bowser v. Department of the Army, Fort A.P. Hill
as 23-2004
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BOWSER
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT A.P. HILL
WOTAWA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00831
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WOTAWA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GurveyIn re: Gurvey
as 23-134
Petitioner:
In re: AMY REBECCA GURVEY
Respondent:
COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C., CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LIVE NATION, INC. and others
Bradley v. US
as 23-1707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH G. BRADLEY, DENNY W. BRANHAM, ROBERTA L. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRULIN & COMPANY, INC., CHARLES F. BUTLER, BURNETT PARTNERSHIP LLP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
