Cases 61 - 70 of 1,104
MCCARTHY v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
DR. JOHN D. MCCARTHY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Arnold v. US
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, SUSAN BOLEK, H. DRAKE GEBHARD and others
Plaintiff:
B&D FARMS, INC., H. KENT EUHUS LIVING TRUST, DIANA EUHUS LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
TRUST MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE D. WILLIAMS and TRUST MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Arellanes v. Defense
as 23-1806
Petitioner:
RALPH D. ARELLANES, SR.
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
as 23-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRUDELL MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL
Counter Defendant:
MONAGHAN MEDICAL CORP.
Not Yet Classified:
D R BURTON HEALTHCARE, LLC
Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
as 23-1779
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRUDELL MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL
Counter Defendant:
MONAGHAN MEDICAL CORP.
Not Yet Classified:
D R BURTON HEALTHCARE, LLC
Reese v. Florida Department of Corrections
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-1747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE B. REESE
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Bradley v. US
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-1707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH G. BRADLEY, DENNY W. BRANHAM, ROBERTA L. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRULIN & COMPANY, INC., CHARLES F. BUTLER, BURNETT PARTNERSHIP LLP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.