Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RYAN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
LYNN RYAN, WEST BAYOU OAKS TOWNHOMES CENTRAL ASSOCIATION, INC., TIMOTHY DARWIN TWINING and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC
as 17-1118
Amicus Curiae:
STEVE WOZNIAK, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, JOSEPH SCOTT MILLER and others
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC and GOOGLE INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
DAWSON v. USA
as 1:2015cv01268
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON , DONALD G. EDGERTON and LISA A. EDGERTON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
GUSTAFSON et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
DAVID GUSTAFSON , ROBERT N. ARMEN, JR. , LEWIS R. CARLUZZO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WADE et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00545
Petitioner:
JEFFERY WADE WADE , ALLISON RENEE WADE and DAWSON TODD WADE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
DAWSON V DVA
as 09-7125
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Larry C. Dawson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
