Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WHITNEY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
MELINDA WHITNEY, KIMBERLY G. GRIFFIN, PATRICK G. JACKSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Secretary of Defense v. Pratt & Whitney
as 23-1337
Appellant:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cross Appellant:
PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of Raytheon Technologies Company
Pratt & Whitney v. Secretary of Defense
as 23-1338
Appellant:
PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of Raytheon Technologies Company
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-2394
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.
Whitney v. Wilkie
as 19-2329
Not Yet Classified:
EXCELL R. WHITNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
WHITNEY et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00809
Petitioner:
REBECCA WHITNEY, RANDALL WHITNEY and SCHUYLER WHITNEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
PHEND v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00773
Petitioner:
WHITNEY MANCINO PHEND
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
MIXTER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00108
Petitioner:
WHITNEY MIXTER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
B & R PLASTICS V WHITNEY DESIGN
as 09-1250
Plaintiff-Appellant:
B & R Plastics, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
Whitney Design, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
