Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sherman v. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas
as 23-1946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK LONNELL SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS and DOES
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC. v. USA
as 1:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
Austal USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BuckshawIn re: Buckshaw
as 22-146
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK and others
Electronic Communication v. Eastern Mountain Sports, Inc.
as 19-1585
Defendant / Appellee:
EASTERN MOUNTAIN SPORTS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
TETRA TECH, INC. v. USA
as 1:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
TETRA TECH, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
EASTERN RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
TETRA TECH, INC. v. USA
as 1:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
TETRA TECH, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
EASTERN RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
NATIONAL FISHERIES INST V US
as 11-1135
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Eastern Fish Company, Inc., Mazzetta Company LLC, National Fisheries Institute, Inc. and others
EASTERN AWNING V HAROLD'S CANVAS
as 09-1449
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Eastern Awning Systems, Inc. and Stephen Lukos
Defendant-Appellee:
Harold Toffey, Harold's Canvas and Awning, Inc. and Toff Industries, Inc.
CONSOLIDATION COAL V US
as 09-5083
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Andalex Resources, Inc., Apogee Coal Company, Arch Western Resources, LLC and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE V US
as 08-5102
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
