Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 265
Brook v. Ruotolo
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellant: Adam Brook, M.D., Ph.D. and The Estate of Dr. Judith Brook
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph Ruotolo, Esq., Ira Salzman, Esq., Diana Rosenthal, Esq. and others
Defendant: Anthony Bacchi, M.D.
Pawelsky v. County of Nassau
as 23-1230
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alan Pawelsky and Ace Auto Recycling, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: County of Nassau, Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Nassau County Police Department and others
Gem Financial Service, Inc. v. City of New York
as 23-1205
Plaintiff: Mitchell Kaminsky, (a majority shareholder of GEM Financial Service, Inc.) and Keith Watts
Plaintiff / Appellee: Gem Financial Service, Inc., DBA Gem Pawnbrokers
Defendant: New York City Police Department and Police Officers John Doe #1-10
Defendant / Appellant: City of New York
Jimenez v. City of Cohoes Police Department
as 23-955
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dayvid Jimenez
Defendant / Appellee: City of Cohoes Police Department, Officer J. Murphy, Badge (1544) City of Cohoes Police Officer in Official Capacity, Officer: John Doe 1, City of Cohoes Police Officer in Offical Capacity and others
Benn v. Morrison
as 23-914
Plaintiff / Appellant: George Benn
Defendant / Appellee: Captain Delroy Morrison, Corrections Department, Shield No. 1293, Individually and in his Official Capacity, C.O. Xavier McNeil, Shield No. 12860, Individually and in his Official Capacity, C.O. Matthew Landow, Shield No. 10333, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Defendant: The City of New York, Det. Felix Cruz, Shield No. 1454, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Det. Gerard Dimuro, Shield No. 2615, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Eckhaus v. City of New York
as 23-846
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mordechai Eckhaus
Defendant / Appellee: City of New York, New York Police Department, Police Officer Andrea Lemmon and others
Defendant: Police Officers John Does 1-10, (assaulting police officers) in their official and individual capacities
Santiago v. Fischer
as 23-855
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jesus Santiago
Defendant / Appellee: Anthony J. Annucci, individually and as Deputy Commissioner of and Counsel to DOCS, Terrence X. Tracy, individually and as Chief Counsel to DOP and Superintendent Brian Fischer, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Andrea W. Evans, individually and as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, State of New York and others
Santiago v. Fischer
as 23-814
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jesus Santiago
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Andrea W. Evans, individually and as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: Superintendent Brian Fischer, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, individually and as Deputy Commissioner of and Counsel to DOCS and Terrence X. Tracy, individually and as Chief Counsel to DOP
Tanvir v. Comey
as 23-738
Plaintiff: Awais Sajjad
Plaintiff / Appellant: Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari
Defendant / Appellee: James Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, "John" Tanzin, Special Agent, FBI, Sanya Garcia, Special Agent FBI and others
Defendant: Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, Christopher M. Piehota, Director, Terrorist Screening Center and others
Francis v. Village of Potsdam
as 23-704
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ethan Francis
Defendant / Appellee: Village of Potsdam, John C. Benson, Police Officer, Potsdam Police Department, individually and officially, Peter G. Lasalla and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?