Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Wiles v. City of New York
as 16-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant: Joshua Wiles
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, a municipal entity, Pastula, New York City Police Officer, Sergeant John Slayne, New York Police Department and others
Defendant: John Does 1-10, New York City Police Officers
Berg v. Kelly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3146
Plaintiff - Appellee: Phoebe Berg, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Toshiro Kida, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, John Rivera, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: NYC PD Officer Sgt. Yesenia Ayala, Sh. No. 13587, NYC PD Officer Sgt. Brenda Batcher, Sh. No. 18825, NYC PD Officer Sgt. Mathew Betting, Sh. No. 12343 and others
Defendant - Appellant: NYCP Commissioner Raymond Kelly, Chief of NYC P.D. Joseph Esposito, James McNamara, Deputy Chief, in their individual and official capacities and others
Williams v. City of New York
as 16-3081
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lawrence Williams
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Detective Brian J. Harrington, (NYPD) Shield #213, Detective Renee Murriel, (NYPD) Retired and others
Ferrari v. County of Suffolk We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-975
Plaintiff - Appellee: James B. Ferrari
Defendant: Christine Malafi and John Doe, 1-10, individually
Defendant - Appellant: County of Suffolk
Rentas v. The City of New York
as 14-2512
Plaintiff - Appellee: Axel Rentas
Defendant: Correction Officer Richard Serrano, Shield No. 2037, in his Official Capacity, City of New York, Correction Officers John Doe, #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant: Captain John Ruffin, Sheild No. 488, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Rentas v. The City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Axel Rentas
Defendant: Correction Officer Richard Serrano, Shield No. 2037, in his Official Capacity and Correction Officers John Doe, #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacities
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Correction Officer Diana Baker, Sheild No. 13239, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Correction Officer Kevin Parker, Shield No. 15629, Individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Captain John Ruffin, Sheild No. 488, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Burgis v. New York City Department of Sa We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1640
Plaintiff - Appellant: Andrenia Burgis, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Christopher Burgos, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Leticia Smith, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Does, 1-10
Defendant - Appellee: New York City Department of Sanitation and John J. Doherty
Vessa v. City of White Plains
as 14-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frank Vessa
Defendant: John Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Mary Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Westchester County District Attorney's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee: City of White Plains, City of White Plains Police Department, Detective Lieutenant Eric Fischer and others
Posner v. City of New York
as 14-461
Plaintiff - Appellant: Betty Posner
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Sgt. Christopher Koch, Shield # 2875, Lieutenant Costello and others
Pinet v. County of Onondaga
as 14-45
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tashara Pinet, Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Raul Pinet, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: County of Onondaga, Kevin E. Walsh, in his individual and official capacity as the Sheriff of Ononaga County, Onondaga County Sheriff's Office and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?