Cases 41 - 50 of 146
Ward v. City of New York
as 17-2973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elaine Ward
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Scott Stringer, New York City Comptroller, Bill de Blasio, New York City Mayor and others
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 17-2909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant - Appellee:
Investigator Peter Paladino, badge #6290, individually and in his official capacity, Lieutenant Sean Dougherty, badge #2553, individually and in his official capacity, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe, #1-6, individually and in their capacity and John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity
Stegemann v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Of
as 17-2719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joshua G. Stegemann
Defendant - Appellee:
Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office, Rensselaer County, Rensselaer County District Attorney's Office and others
McNamara v. City of Long Beach
as 17-1602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brian McNamara
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, The Long Beach Volunteer Fire Department, (LBVFD) and Scott Kemins, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant - Appellant:
Jack Schnirman, in his individual and official capacity
Ferran et al v. City of Albany et al
as 17-748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark R. Ferran and Nadia Ferran
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Albany, Hon. Gerald H. Jennings, (ex Mayor); individual and official capacity, Robert C. Forezzi, Sr., (Chief of Fire and Emergency Services), individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Vacant Building Initiative Project Team, John Doe 6 through 8, (individual "personnel of the City of Albany Department of Fire & Emergency Services and the Division of Building and Codes" and/or of the "Department of Public Safety"), John Doe 11 through 20, all as Individuals and in their Official Capacities, herein referred to as the City Defendants and others
Wright v. Musanti
as 17-632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Scott Wright
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Michael Manetta
Defendant - Appellant:
Jacqueline Musanti
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-182
Plaintiff:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-185
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-180
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Gusler v. The City of Long Beach
as 17-82
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jay Gusler
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of Long Beach, The Long Beach Volunteer Fire Department, The Long Beach Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
