Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Santiago v. Fischer
as 23-855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesus Santiago
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, individually and as Deputy Commissioner of and Counsel to DOCS, Terrence X. Tracy, individually and as Chief Counsel to DOP and Superintendent Brian Fischer, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Andrea W. Evans, individually and as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, State of New York and others
Santiago v. Fischer
as 23-814
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jesus Santiago
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Andrea W. Evans, individually and as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Superintendent Brian Fischer, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, individually and as Deputy Commissioner of and Counsel to DOCS and Terrence X. Tracy, individually and as Chief Counsel to DOP
Betances v. Fischer
as 15-2836
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Paul Betances, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Lloyd A. Barnes and Gabriel Velez, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, AKA Gabriel Belize
Defendant:
Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr., individually, former Acting Commissioner of The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Glenn S. Goord, former Commissioner of The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, John Does 1-25, (DOCS Supervisory, Training, and Police Personnel) and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Fischer, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Anthony J. Annucci, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Commissioner and Counsel for The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Terence Tracy, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as Chief Counsel for the Division of Parole
Betances v. Fischer et al
as 12-704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Paul Betances, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Lloyd A. Barnes and Gabriel Velez, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, AKA Gabriel Belize
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Fischer, Individually, Brian Fischer, in his capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Anthony J. Annucci and others
Sudler v. City of New York
as 11-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terence Sudler
Defendant:
Bureau Chief, Department Of Corrections Custody Management & Environmental Health Department from June 2005 to July 2006, Coordinator New York City Department Of Corrections Inmate Records, from June 2005 to July 2006, John Doe, Clerical Staff Worker at Rikers Island who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Martin F. Horn, of the New York City Department of Corrections (NYCDOC), Warden, Who was in charge of Plaintiff's Correctional Facility at Rikers Island and others
Batthany v. Horn
as 11-1216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Batthany
Defendant - Appellee:
John Doe Clerical Staff Worker(s) at Plaintiff's NYC DOC Correctional Facility, who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Richard Roe Supervisor of John Doe Clerical Staff Worker(s) at Plaintiff'sNYC DOC Correctional Facility, who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), John Does, Employees of the City of New York and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
