Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Harris v. Tioga County
as 23-652
Plaintiff / Appellee: Calvin Harris
Defendant: Tioga County District Attorney's Office, Unidentified Jane/John Doe #1-10 Tioga County Employees, Tioga County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Steven Anderson, New York State Police Investigator and Susan Mulvey, New York State Police Investigator
Harris v. Tioga County
as 23-503
Plaintiff / Appellee: Calvin Harris
Defendant: Tioga County District Attorney's Office, Unidentified Jane/John Doe #1-10 Tioga County Employees, Steven Anderson, New York State Police Investigator and others
Defendant / Appellant: Tioga County and Gerald Keene, Former Tioga County District Attorney
Frey v. Bruen
as 23-365
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jason Frey, Brianna Frey, Jack Cheng and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City, New York, Keechant Sewell, in her Official Capacity and Steven Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity
Defendant: Kevin P. Bruen, Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police, in his official capacity and Dermot Shea, in his official capacity as NYPD Police Commissioner
Giambalvo v. New York
as 23-208
Plaintiff / Appellant: Zachary Giambalvo, John Mougios, Kevin McLaughlin and others
Defendant / Appellee: Suffolk County, New York, Police Commissioner Rodney Harrison, in his Official Capacity, Michael Komorowski, Individually and others
Defendant: John Does 1-5, Individually and Jane Does 1-5, Individually
Petitioner: New York State Attorney General
Spencer v. Nigrelli
as 22-3237
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael Spencer and His Tabernacle Family Church, Inc.
Defendant: Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney for the County of Chemung, New York, in his official and individual capacities, Matthew Van Houten, District Attorney for the County of Tompkins, New York, in his official and individual capacities and Everytown for Gun Safety
Defendant / Appellant: Steven A. Nigrelli, Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police, in his official and individual capacities
Corbett v. Hochul
as 22-3210
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jonathan Corbett
Defendant / Appellee: Kathleen Hochul, in her official capacity as chief executive of the State of New York, Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York and others
Gazzola v. Hochul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3068
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nadine Gazzola, individually, and as coowner, President, and as BATFE Federal Firearms Licensee Responsible Person for Zero Tolerance Manufacturing, Inc., Seth Gazzola, individually, and as coowner, Vice President, and as BATFE FFL Responsible Person for Zero Tolerance Manufacturing, Inc., John A. Hanusik, individually, and as owner and as BATFE FFL Responsible Person for d/b/a AGA Sales and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kathleen Hochul, in her Official Capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as the Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police, Rossana Rosado, in her Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Criminal Justice Services of the New York State Police and others
Zavalidroga v. Marshall
as 22-1967
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tomas Zavalidroga, individually and as administrator of Margaret Zavalidroga other Margaret Zavalidroga
Defendant / Appellee: Ryan Marshall, Oneida County Sheriff's Deputy, individually and officially, Rick Marshall, Town of Annsville road supervisor, Town of Annsville, a municipality and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1068
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1073
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?