Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Broecker v. New York City Department of Education
as 23-655
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nicole Broecker, Michelle Martino, Gina Porcello and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Department of Education, Meisha Porter, United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and others
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO, Inc. v. De Blasio
as 22-2649
Plaintiff: Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO, Inc., Asian American Coalition for Education, Philip Yan Hing Wong and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Chinese American Citizens Alliance of Greater New York
Defendant / Appellee: Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of New York and Richard A Carranza, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education
Intervenor: Teens Take Charge, Desis Rising Up and Moving, Hispanic Federation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-939
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-517
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1055
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Torres v. The State of New York
as 18-646
Plaintiff - Appellant: Adriana Torres, Individually and on behalf of
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, Judge Arnold Lim, Individually and as Judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, the County of Richmond, City of New York and others
Defendant: John Doe and Richard Roe
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-3405
Plaintiff - Appellee: Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Kettely Laraque, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as a memeber of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as a member of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant: William J. Rold
Intervenor: New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Torres v. State of New York
as 17-1173
Plaintiff - Appellant: Adriana Torres, Individually and on behalf of
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, Judge Arnold Lim, Individually and as Judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, the County of Richmond, City of New York and others
Defendant: John Doe and Richard Roe
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-160
Plaintiff - Appellee: Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant: William J. Rold
Intervenor: New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?