Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schlosser v. Kwak
as 23-649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Defendant / Appellee:
Hunchu Kwak, Judge, Individual Capacity, Kathleen McNamara, Judge, Individual Capacity, Ann Lynch, Judge, Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
Cornell Scott, Grant St Partnership, William Krahe, LCSW, Maura Fisher, APRN and others
Barnes v. Fischer
as 23-729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner of DOCCS; sued in individual capacity, David A. Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Upstate Correctional fAcility; sued in individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Rick Caron, Electronic Equipment Mechanic; Upstate Correctional Facility, David Mattoon, Electronic Equipment Mechanic; Upstate Correctional Facility, A. Southworth, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Jordan v. Corrections
as 23-708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Official Capacity, Rollin Cook, Comm of Correc., Ret, Official & Individual Capacity, Angel Quiros, Comm of Corr., Official & Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
Solomon Baymon, Dep. Warden, Ret., Official & Individual Capacity, Jeffrey C. Jeannotte, Dep. Warden, Official & Individual Capacity, Barone, Warden, Official & Individual Capacity and others
Jordan v. Gifford
as 23-622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Gifford, Correctional Officer, in his individual capacity, Russell, Correctional Officer, in his individual capacity, Lamountain, Correctional Officer, in his individual capacity and others
Rivera v. Erfe
as 23-477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angel Rivera
Defendant / Appellee:
Liuetenant Mucha, Correctional Officer Bryant and Correctional Officer Adams
Defendant:
Scott Erfe, Warden
Barnes v. Fischer
as 22-3152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
David A. Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Upstate Correctional fAcility; sued in individual capacity, Theodore Zarniak, Captain; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner of DOCCS; sued in individual capacity, Joseph Bellinier, Deputy Commissioner of Facilities Operations; sued in individual capacity, John W. Leclair, Maintenance Superintendent; Upstate C.F.; sued in individual capacity and others
Barnes v. Fischer
as 22-2902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner of DOCCS; sued in individual capacity, David A. Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Upstate Correctional fAcility; sued in individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Joseph Bellinier, Deputy Commissioner of Facilities Operations; sued in individual capacity, John W. Leclair, Maintenance Superintendent; Upstate C.F.; sued in individual capacity, Rick Caron, Electronic Equipment Mechanic; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Scott v. Sullivan
as 22-3064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Commissioner of Mental Health, Daniell Dill, Acting Executive Director for Deborah McCulloch, Executive Director Central New York Psychiatric Center, Mr. Jamie Temple, Chief for Security, CNYPC and others
Stepherson v. Haaland
as 22-2936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Anthony Stepherson, Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, a Noble, a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propia Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae, DBA Jamal El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony John Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, DBA Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Marshall Saul and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
