Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Nunez v. City of New York
as 17-2180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Francisco Nunez
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, a municipal entity, Detective Damian Diedrick, Shield #923769 in their individual and official capacities, Detective Cliff Acosta, Shield #982718 in their individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Does Nos. 1, 2, 3, etc., (Whose identities are unknown but who are known to be police officers of the New York City Police Department), all of whom are sued individually and in their official capacities and Richard and/or Rachel Roes Nos. 1, 2, 3, etc., (Whose identities are unknown but who are known to be supervisory personnel of the New York City Police Department), all of whom are sued individually and in their official capacities
Adamou v. The County of Spotsylvania, Vi
as 17-255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Idrissa Adamou
Defendant:
The County of Spotsylvania, Virginia, Spotsylvania County Sheriff's Office, John and/or Jane Does Nos. 1, 2, 3, etc., (whose identities are unknown but who are known to be police officers and employees of the Spotsylvania County Sheriff's Office) in their individual capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Detective Edward J. Doyle, in his individual capacity
Garnett v. City of New York
as 15-1489
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Kwame Garnett
Defendant - Appellee:
Undercover Officer C0243, Individually and In his official capacity
Defendant:
City of New York, Neftali Betances, Individually and In his official capacity, Keith Carpenter, Individually and In his official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Undercover Officer C0039, Individually and In his official capacity
Ortiz v. The City of New York
as 13-2421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Ortiz
Defendant:
The City of New York, James Theis, a former detective employed by the New York City Police, as individual; in their official capacities., Michael Codella, a former detective with the New York City Housing Authority Police Department, as individual; in their official capacities, AKA Rambo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
New York City Housing Authority
Preacely v. The City of New York/NYPD
as 13-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Woodrow Wilson Preacely, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York/NYPD, Mindy Blackstock, Esq., Richard Fernandez, Sergeant 33rd. Pct. and others
Barbagallo v. Marcum LLP
as 13-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Joseph S. Barbagallo
Defendant:
Citrin Cooperman &Company, LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
John Doe Nos. 1 through 9
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Marcum LLP
Barbagallo v. Marcum LLP
as 13-765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph S. Barbagallo
Defendant:
Citrin Cooperman &Company, LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
Marcum LLP and John Doe Nos. 1 through 9
Berg v. 505-23 Bar Inc.
as 12-4019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yehuda J. Berg
Defendant - Appellee:
David Ugarte, Walter Butler, John Does, Nos. 1 through 5 and others
Home Loan Investment Bank, F.S v. Goodness & Mercy, Inc.
as 12-3262
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Home Loan Investment Bank, F.S.B., FKA Ocean Bank, F.S.B
Defendant:
New York State Department of Taxation & Finance, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, United States of America and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Goodness & Mercy, Inc., Mary Gilliam and Harriet A. Gilliam
Preacely v. City of New York
as 12-3061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Woodrow Wilson Preacely
Defendant:
Mincy Blackstock, Esq., Kimberly Peterson, Fort Washington Housing Assistant, Four (4) New York Police Department/New York City Housing Authority Officer/Detectives(s) JIll Does, or other "Public Officers" who have overseen "Neighborhood Watch" and Viper Unit Investigatory Activities against Plaintiff against Plaintiff in his own and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York/New York Police Department, New York City Housing Authority and Mindy Blackstock, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
