Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Soule v. Connecticut Association of Sch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1365
Defendant / Appellee: Danbury Public Schools Board of Education, Glastonbury Public Schools Board of Education, Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Chelsea Mitchell, a minor, by Christina Mitchell, her mother, Alanna Smith, a minor, by Cheryl Radachowsky, her mother, Ashley Nicoletti, a minor, by Jennifer Nicoletti, her mother and others
Petitioner: Business Executives
Amicus Curiae: American Academy of Pediatrics, Hezekiah Beardsley Connecticut Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, New York State American Academy of Pediatrics and others
State of New York v. Trump
as 20-2630
Petitioner: Howard County, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, State of Colorado and others
Respondent: Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Census Bureau, Donald J. Trump, United States Department of Commerce and others
State of New York v. Department of Energy
as 19-3652
Petitioner: State of Maine, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Michigan and others
Respondent: United States Department of Energy and Rick Perry, United States Department of Energy
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee: Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff: ABC
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1988
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1525
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her official capacity and others
Trump v. State of New York
as 18-1314
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Respondent: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
State of New York v. Trump
as 18-488
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?